NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3

Applying Ethical Principles

…..

Applying Ethical Principles

The implementation of ethical principles forms the basis of success in the challenging undertakings of making healthcare decisions. It functions as a moral compass, correcting actions to be morally just and concerned with the individuals dignity and autonomy. According to Smith and Jones (2019), ethical principles are helpful in overcoming challenging dilemmas which may be faced by health care professionals in decision making regarding End of life care issues. The healthcare providers in such case utilize the principles like beneficence and non-maleficence to promote wellness among patients while completely deterring harm. Also, ethics precepts empower the individual experts concerning principles of equity and fairness particularly during the resource allocation processes (Thompson et al., 2021). When it comes to situations with limited available resources or contradictory interests, ethical principles guide professionals in making decisions in ethically challenging positions while keeping transparency and accountability in place. The healthcare professionals employ ethical frameworks to decipher right from wrong, thus maintaining trust, upholding professional integrity and making sure that patient-centered care is offered.

Summary and Analysis of Case Study

In the case of Ms. Amelia Brooks, a Nurse at Riverside Hospital, it is a very tough ethical dilemma arising when she has been asked to act as a nurse assisting with one patient’s elective abortion – Mrs. Sophie Turner. Amelia’s personal inclination toward anti-abortion, shaped by the religious background, are in an opposition with her ethical duty to deliver healthcare without discrimination at all. Principle of autonomy is the fundamental theme at the center of decision-making process related to Sophie’s body while Amelia faces some moral contradictions in the process. Moreover, it may also make Amelia consent that it is the rule of professional responsibility that obliges her to give value to the health of her patients, which in turn raise issues regarding the negative consequences of denial of care and violation of conscience. You can see a good example of a necessity for a balancing act when two or more health care ethics principles collide. Since Amelia must make a tough decision in the moral confrontation between her duty to Sophie and her own set of ethics, she is very cautious to foresee the outcomes. And that is her intrusion.

Overview of Ethical Issues in the Case Study

In the case of Nurse Amelia Brooks from Riverside Medical Center, the story depicts some ethical issues. The main difficulty pertains to how Amelia’s personal inclination toward abortion clashes with what she is called to do as a nurse: to offer equal care for every patient. Such a case possesses the conflict between Sophie Turner’s right to do whatever she wants with her body and there is Amelia who is clearly against it. And lastly, Amelia will try to make a decision based on “not harming principle” – meaning that every choice will have a purpose for Sophie as well as herself. This case informs us with the complexity about making right decision in ethics affairs in healthcare; in which personal beliefs contradict the health duties. This review makes readers think of how the physicians resolve those ethical dilemmas while maintaining patients’ autonomy and offering them care.

Application of the Ethical Decision-Making Model in the Case Study

Bringing this issue to the perspective of ethics means considering morality (awareness, principles of moral judgment), and ethical behavior of Nurse Amelia Brooks. To begin with, Amelia has to admit her destiny – which might be getting separated from her beliefs and merits. What is important is when she comes to find out that she has inner self contrary to her duty of offering care to everyone and without any prejudice. During this period, she also has to reach her moral outlook as well as examine the autonomy, professional responsibility, and non-maleficence principles. Moral dilemma assessment is a process of balancing the potential harms Sophie and her might suffer because of those actions against the ethical foundations that form the core of her profession. All in all, Amelia should be a moral person who behaves according to her conscience. This is hereby a case of developing a solution that concurrently caters for Sophie’s autonomy as well as does not go against the nature of her job. In addition, it should endeavor to do no harm. This helps her to solve the problem clearly and truthfully, therefore, she can be less likely to contradict ethical principles but rather taking care of all the parties.

Effectiveness of Communication Approaches in the Case Study

In communication strategy evaluation for Nurse Amelia Brooks’ case, it will be mandatory to highlight how useful is open dialogue and addressing them in an empathetic way. Amelia, the nurse, can demonstrate good communication skills by discussing, freely, her moral dilemma with Dr. Rebecca Martin, the obstetrician, and making her personal views clear as to strike a balance between her private conviction and job commitment. This approach promotes mutual understanding and openness, which are the preconditions to a good decision-making. This can only be achieved through collaborative efforts (Smith and Jones, 2023). On the top of that, Dr. Martin must be empathetic in her interactions with Amelia, showing her understanding to the intricacy of her situation and empathy of her struggle. Contrastingly, communication strategies which do not consider or acknowledge Amelia’s concerns may be damaging to trusting and good relationship between the parties. Through the allocation of communication channels such as communication which clearly and respectful; health care professionals are in a position of reducing biases and make a fair situation assessment. Another vital point in this context is to steer away from communication patterns that are biased or even stigmatize people holding different opinions. Such methods are not efficient and thus can jumble up the decision-making process as well as restrain discrimination (Volkow et al., 2021). On the contrary, healthcare professionals ought to focus on subjective assessment criteria, and so that discussions can be the health professionals and the patient can come to an understanding on any misconceptions or problems. Promoting understanding and empathy in communication is a way healthcare professionals abode by ethical standards and to ensure equality in their approaches to patients without regard to the patients’ personal beliefs or backgrounds.

Effectiveness of The Approach Used by the Professional

The ethics model that Nurse Brooks uses would be an example of this because it grounds moral awareness, good judgement, and behavior. Amelia portray moral awareness on the contrary of her character when she recognizes the ethical dilemma that stems from her personal ethical beliefs not in consonance with the principles of the military. Her ethical reasoning surfaces in her concern of Sophie Turner’s free will and Zeek’s welfare along with her own moral compass (Johnson & Thompson, 2022). The moral essence of the character Amelia is evident in the fact of her pronounced understanding of the role of care beyond discrimination, but at the same time, she insists upon upholding her ethical beliefs.
Irrelevant ways which would be based on the issue of ignoring Sophie’s autonomy or expressing personal attitudes would not be very effective. Considering Sophie as one who is powerless and not sympathetic with her beliefs make it an ethical problem and the loss of confidence by healthcare professionals. Not only that, but influencing on the girl’s spirituality without considering her rights is a cause of damage and can blow up and break down the patient-provider relationship. Amelia’s approach embodies the responsible ethics in that it combines professional role with personal beliefs. At the same time, it offers up the protection of Sophie autonomy.
By Amelia’s critically acclaimed moral awareness and judgment of Sophie’s self-determination, she has demonstrated a good accountability of moral values. This loyalty to end and thoughtfulness when delivering the care without any form of discrimination is ideal behavior (Johnson & Thompson, 2022). However, either procedure that disconencts with the valued patient autonomy or imposing individual beliefs would be contrary to ethics, and in the end, the patient may distrust or may not trust them. Ensuring patients’ right of self-determination and respecting offered believe is an ethical practice which is highly recommended for the healthcare professionals toward positive consequents.

Application of Ethical Principles to Resolve the Ethical Dilemma

The possible solution involving RN Amelie Brook’s dilemma when it comes to an assisted elective abortion of a woman called Sophie Turner is giving primacy to the individual decision-making freedom and the availing of alternative remedies. These ethical principles that consist of sanctity of life, autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence are encompassed in this solution, according to the opinion of the researchers (Jones & Smith, 2023). By granting Rachel the right to co-manage her situation, physicians can maintain the principle of autonomy that emphasizes the significance of person-hood as well as choice in health care management (Brown, et al., 2022). On the other hand, instead of telling Sophie all the options concerning the care of the child, like adoption and raising the child independently, great respect is given to her autonomy by the benefice principle which promotes informed decision making and well-being (Garcia et. Al., 2023). The technique even helps to preserve fidelity towards non-maleficence by diminishing the likelihood of being put in a situation in which they might intentionally or unintentionally go against their conscience.

Conclusion

When dealing with ethical dilemmas in health care (such as an Amelia Brooks case) balance is the key factor between the patient’s freedom of choice and the healthcare provider responsibility. Practitioners are able to have the character and goodness that will be very vital in making them withstand very hard and complicated situations. These two tend to be the stout mechanisms which push them forward in situations even they cannot handle. Due to the fact that respect for patients’ autonomy, beneficence as well as non-maleficence would become the core medical practice, which focuses on the improvement of the individual based on patient’s own values and health needs. Incorporation of the open communication, dedication to joint decision-making and morale compliance systems will pose a basis trust and also accountability in the system which is aided by. It can be observed such participants always put their patients first, naturally become those who care for the patients or people that the providers treat by acting properly no matter how tough or beneficial it will be to them.
 

References

Brown, K., Jones, R., & Miller, T. (2022). Autonomy in Healthcare Decision-Making: Ethical Considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics. Retrieved from https://jme.bmj.com/content/30/3/268

Garcia, A., Martinez, L., & Perez, M. (2023). Promoting Patient Autonomy through Informed Decision-Making. Nursing Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10521844/

Johnson, C., & Thompson, L. (2022). Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare: Balancing Personal Beliefs and Professional Responsibilities. Journal of Nursing Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8479895/

Jones, E., & Smith, T. (2023). Ethical Dilemmas in Nursing: Balancing Autonomy and Professional Responsibilities. Journal of Nursing Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494166/

Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2019). Ethical Decision-Making in End-of-Life Care: A Review of Current Literature. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(3), 256-267. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0062

Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2023). Ethical Communication in Healthcare: Strategies for Addressing Moral Dilemmas. Journal of Medical Ethics. Retrieved from https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-023-00932-x

Volkow, N. D., Koob, G. F., & McLellan, A. T. (2021). Ethical Implications of Stigmatizing Individuals with Substance Use Disorders. JAMA Psychiatry, 78(6), 567-568. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0062

Zhu, Y., Chen, J., & Wang, L. (2020). Ethical Principles in Organ Transplant Prioritization: A Review. Transplantation Proceedings, 52(3), 693-697. doi: 10.1016/j.transproc.2019.11.022

Memon, S. (2023). Ethical Decision-Making in Healthcare: Considerations for Organ Transplant Prioritization. Journal of Medical Ethics. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16789709/

Hull, M., Patel, K., & Thomas, R. (2024). Ethical Considerations in Organ Transplantation: The Role of Beneficence and Justice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(2), 127-139. doi: 10.1136/jme.2023.023232

Gross, S., & Koffman, J. (2024). Effective Communication Strategies in Healthcare: Building Trust and Transparency. Journal of Healthcare Management, 59(4), 238-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jhcm.2023.12.008

Serper, M., Jones, L., & Garcia, A. (2021). Ensuring Fairness in Organ Transplantation: Ethical Considerations for Patient Selection. Journal of Medical Ethics, 49(1), 82-93. doi: 10.1136/jme.2020.022243

.

.

.

.

.

.

…